With the tremendous competition out in the market, setting up an eCommerce business was not and will never be an easy task. With the goal for you to succeed as an entrepreneur and deal with your eCommerce business adequately, you’ll have to figure out why most of the eCommerce businesses fall flat.
Starting an online business can be relatively easy, fast, and less expensive. However, with something like an 80% failure rate, making it a fruitful one is more challenging than a few people can imagine.
While each new business is unique, there are some common pitfalls that lead to eCommerce business failures. Understanding these pitfalls can help you with to avoid them and beat the record. To help you find these pitfalls, here is the story of an eCommerce website Boo.com failure which was closed in less than a year after its launch in spite of having millions in funding.
The boo.com case remains an important case study for a wide range of businesses since it doesn’t just highlight the difficulties of managing eCommerce for a garments retailer, but instead highlights failings in management and strategy that can be made in any sort of organization.
When boo.com was launched in 1998, its three founders were at that time famous business tycoons because of selling their successful online bookseller website bokus.com. Boo.com was bound to be their next example of success: the first eCommerce retailer selling games equip and a trendy organization for the internet hungry Generation.
Boo.com’s 100 offices around the world had to shut down in 2000, after the organization, already in a spiral, couldn’t raise any more funds from its investors. After 18 years, we are as still discussing this failed eCommerce business, not just because it was fabulous but because the reasons behind its demise are immortal and a wakeup call for present-day entrepreneurs, marketers and startups.
When started, the valuation of the company was more than 200 million. At that time, it was a very big figure. But, in just eighteen months boo.com went bankrupt after burning all the money of investors. Here is what went wrong with an explanation of the same:
Boo.com’s founders used £125 million in only a half year, to advertise itself as a global organization but then had to manage various issues like diverse languages, tax structure and pricing in nations it served. Their sales weren’t up to their desire, due to various reasons and the company died too early because of no funds left when their initial plan failed.
The marketing team at boo.com was often able to overrule the technical people. Even when it comes to taking the important technical ecommerce website development decisions, the marketing team used to make ones. Therefore, the organization made the most attractive looking website on the internet, with the poorest functionality.
The founders of Boo.com concentrated excessively on a flashy and cutting-edge design for their website, which featured 3-D images and technology enabling clients to zoom in on various parts of a product. As a result, their website was tormented by technical problems and delays and took twice as long as expected to develop.
At the time Boo.com launched, 20% of UK families had access to the internet and they were utilizing slow dial-up connections. It seems like the team at boo.com was not aware of this fact because they developed a heavy website that was not able to load on such a slow internet connection.
Also, anybody with a Macintosh PC (popular at that time) was also not able to utilize it. While Boo.com later balanced itself to permit users with slower connections and Macs to obtain access, the changes came too late.
No doubt, marketing is the most powerful pillar on which success of a business stands. But, when it goes wrong, everything vanishes. Boo.com marketed an ill product and that too excessively. Their marketing was lavish and expensive. Before boo.com even went on the web, more than 350,000 potential clients wanted to be notified of the website’s launch.
A big advertising and PR campaign, which accounted for millions of dollars, had effectively made a global brand of a store not even seen on the web yet. But, developing the website took much longer than expected. As a result, marketing expenditure continued spiraling and not a solitary sale was being made.
To attract their target audience, boo.com decided to provide the physical shopping experience online, including a virtual shopping assistant. No doubt it was a clever idea – but its implementation required complex programming, which just functioned admirably over a broadband connection (as specified above), while most clients still utilized a dial-up association around then. As a result, the users lost their patience with boo.com.
One of the fundamental factors that contributed to boo’s speedy demise was the choice to launch it in 18 different countries at the same time. A similar marketing campaign and website for every national market may have appeared to be a good idea to bind together a global brand identity, however, this misguided and costly strategy was turned into the original ‘how not to’ case for businesses trying to attract a global audience.
Towards the end of boo.com, the organization promoted a money-off plan. ‘The best methods of advertising the plan ended up being not costly online banners or newsletters advertising by emails,’ says boo co-founder Ernst Malmsten. This obvious acknowledgment came rather too late.
With any website, especially one for an eCommerce business, it is best to go for the lowest common denominator approach. That means the focus should be on mostly widely applicable circumstance or requirement. You have to make sure that your website works on every one of the devices smoothly in all circumstances.
If you put your brand under the media spotlight too soon, every mistake you commit will be noticed. Keep in mind that publicity is great just when it is defended. Unless you back it up with a strong brand performance it holds the potentials of betraying you.
Maintaining any eCommerce business can be costly. But, if your business profits are in the thousands, you should not spend millions in the hope that the deals will improve later on. Leave excessively hopeful and unsupportable forecasts to spiritualists and focus on the present reality.
Boo was an incredible brand. But, still it failed. What we can learn from its story is that branding is about more than just looking good. It is about fulfilling promises. The promises boo made – both to its customers and investors – were at last undelivered. Now boo’s image is no more of a global brand but of a failed brand. And with its negative example, it has helped us to learn the true value of branding on the Internet.
(2 ratings, average: 2.50 out of 5)